Friday, May 26, 2017

Branch Reflection #2

Analysis

Learning occurs in many different ways.  Over the years, researchers have developed behavioral and social learning theories.  Pavlov, Skinner, and Bandura are key researchers of learning theories.    

Ivan Pavlov's research resulted in classical conditioning, a behavioral learning theory.  In his work, Pavlov discovered that "a neutral stimulus that at first prompts no response becomes paired with an unconditioned stimulus and gains the power of that stimulus to cause a response" (Slavin, 2015, p.102).  He found that subjects could be conditioned for a certain behavior.  

B. F. Skinner, a researcher who focused on the relationship between behaviors and consequences, developed the theory of operant conditioning.  Skinner's work revealed that both pleasant and unpleasant consequences changed behaviors (Slavin, 2015, p.101).  When a consequence is enjoyed and prompts increasing the frequency of the behavior, it is said to be a reinforcer.  Any consequence that is undesirable and decreases the occurrence of the behavior is called a punisher.  

Behavior learning theorists believe that consequences should occur immediately following an action; a connection should be made between the behavior and the consequence (Slavin, 2015, p.107-108).  They also agree that all efforts should first be made to praise good decisions before issuing a consequence.  In addition, shaping is a process in which researchers believe subjects can be guided step by step to success; instead of expecting the end product to be exhibited right away, a person is praised along the way, acknowledging each milestone.

Albert Bandura's work with social learning theory supports observational learning.  His work suggests that people learn a great deal from modeling and vicarious learning.  He believes that when a person mimics an observed behavior, he/she expects the observed outcome.  Bandura's observational learning theory includes four phases: attentional, retention, reproduction, and motivational (Slavin, 2015, p.114).                  

Reflection

Over the last few days, I have paid closer attention to my words and actions regarding behaviors, both at school and at home.  Reading about the various behavioral and social learning theories served as a great reminder.   Children need to have good examples to follow, and they need ample guidance on desired expectations.

Just as the age-old saying goes, "monkey see, monkey do."  I agree with the work of Bandura; children will mimic the behavior they see modeled.  Whether a behavior is seen at home, on television, or on the playground, students will likely repeat what they see and hear.  For example, if a pop culture cartoon character consistently calls others a jerk, a child who watches the show will likely begin calling people a jerk.  It is vital that I model the behaviors I want my students and daughters to imitate.  If I expect my students to walk silently on the right side of the hall, I should walk silently on the right side of the hall.  If I expect my daughters to use good table manners at dinner, I should exhibit good table manners at the dinner table.      

According to Skinner's operant conditioning theory, I should reinforce any behaviors I expect students to exhibit (Slavin, 2015, p.104).  Some students are intrinsically motivated, but many of my students are extrinsically motivated; I offer incentives for positive choices.  The most eye-opening material I read involved reinforcers and punishers, specifically positive and negative reinforcers.  I was amazed by the content regarding students talking out in class.  I feel certain that in most cases I have acknowledged a student for speaking out at an inappropriate time, reprimanding and correcting the behavior.  By doing so, I have been reinforcing the behavior; even though I am not giving a pleasant response to the behavior, my interaction serves as a negative reinforcer.  Instead, I should ignore the students who are not following directions and publicly praise those students who are choosing obedience.

Even before this class began, I was already in conversation with some of my colleagues about routines and procedures.  At the beginning of each school year, I feel that I have been jumping too quickly into curriculum, sacrificing the appropriate time needed for habits to form with routines and procedures.  One of my goals for the 2017-2018 school year is to structure my first week around behaviors rather than content.  Then, along the way, I plan to carve out time for practice.  Using the work of Skinner and Bandura as a foundation, hopefully I will instill behaviors that promote a better learning environment.    

References

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.      

Thursday, May 18, 2017

Branch Reflection #1

Analysis

A good teacher is many things; ask any number of people, and the responses will vary.  According to Slavin, a good teacher knows the content and how to best present it, possesses strong pedagogy for "instructional effectiveness," and makes intentional decisions with a specific outcome in mind (2015, p.4-6).  

Knowing the content beyond the curriculum is essential to teaching, but an educator must also be proficient in the best practices for presenting the information to students.  A good teacher should be able to communicate in a way that is relevant to children.  First-rate pedagogy encompasses "motivating students, managing the classroom, assessing prior knowledge, communicating ideas effectively, taking into account the characteristics of the learners, assessing learning outcomes, and reviewing information" (Slavin, 2015, p.5).  In addition, self-reflection is a key characteristic of a strong teacher.  An intentional teacher believes that all students can learn and will do whatever is necessary to ensure that all students receive the very best.  In order to always give the best, good teachers consistently reflect on outcomes, improve strategies and content knowledge, and collaborate with peers to grow in their profession.

Another component of good teaching is understanding educational psychology and cognitive development theories and using that knowledge when working with students.  For example, according to Piaget's stages of development, a fifth grade math teacher must rely a great deal on concrete conceptual models because students are entering the beginning stages of abstract thinking (Slavin, 2015, p.32).  Furthermore, using research-based strategies and resources warrant better success in the classroom.


Reflection


I have experienced a tremendous amount of growth since I first entered the classroom.  My content knowledge is ever-increasing (In fact, I learned more information in a professional development session TODAY!), my pedagogy is evolving daily (for the better!), and I use the Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) model to make intentional decisions for my students.  Professional development and collaboration are the avenues I use for success.

When I re-entered the classroom four years ago, I changed age groups and subject areas (from middle school ELA to fifth grade math).  Transitioning to a completely different setting combined with an eight year break from the classroom, I had a lot to learn.  To put it lightly, I was overwhelmed!  The shift was a humbling but amazing career move.  Being a strong math student did not make me a strong math teacher.  I had to learn best practices for teaching the curriculum, and self-reflection was a daily exercise that stretched me to places of examination I had never experienced.  I knew that if I wanted my students to do their best, I had to give my best.  

In regards to cognitive development, I just recently explored theories to support work I want to do with a math deficit my school is facing.  By investigating research-based strategies and understanding the theories that support them, I hope to aid students in their quest to math fact fluency.  For example, as I examined incremental rehearsal strategies, I discovered that Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory would support them.  The theory states that pairing students for peer assisted drill and practice is a fruitful strategy that benefits fluent students and those needing to build fluency (Arnold, 2012, p. 30).  Because the strategy and the theory are research-based, I feel confident that success will be a result of implementation.    


References

Arnold, K. (2012, Fall). Theoretical frameworks for math fact fluency. Jaasep, 28-33. 


Slavin, R. E. (2015). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

New Adventures

Branch Blog 6115 has been created for the purpose of my EDAT 6115 class.  I look forward to learning through blogging! 😊

Branch Reflection #8

Analysis Planning classroom lessons requires far more than choosing a cute activity from Pinterest or Teachers Pay Teachers.  Effectiv...